by Nathan Barnard – also posted on www.theway.co.uk
The global fight against the coronavirus pandemic has taken another step towards establishing a worldwide dictatorial total surveillance society. International efforts are seeking to utilise new methods of health surveillance through embracing wastewater epidemiology,     technologies that can analyse what people excrete into the sewers.  
Biobots Analytics, a U.S company, has been applying this technology in the fight against opium addiction. Likewise, Bath University, in the U.K., has been researching ‘biomarkers’ in wastewater to evaluate drug use for the past decade. However, this revolutionary technology is now being employed in the fight against COVID-19.  Recent studies have shown that analysing human excrement can reveal COVID-19 even in asymptomatic persons.
Wu et al. (2020) research ‘SARS-CoV-2 Titers in Wastewater Are Higher than Expected from Clinically Confirmed Cases’ concluded that SARS-CoV-2 RNA was evident in sewage and therefore determined that through applying wastewater epidemiological analysis it may be possible to predict future outbreaks. Furthermore, Wu et al. (2020) study ‘SARS-CoV-2 titers in wastewater foreshadow dynamics, and clinical presentation of new COVID-19 cases‘ concluded that wastewater epidemiology analysis is occurrent in predicting and monitoring SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks.
Yet while such technology offers the possibility of monitoring outbreaks of the coronavirus, will it be utilised? Already in the U.S, this is being hailed as a revolutionary breakthrough in the battle against COVID-19. The HHS has backed the implementation of this technology in wastewater treatment plants across 42 states to establish water-based coronavirus monitoring for 36 million Americans. The first phase of this will be completed by the end of November 2020. The information gleaned from the wastewater epidemiological analysis will be imputed into the HHS Protection System Database. But, questions have already been raised as to the availability of this information and how it will be stored.
Rep. TJ Cox along with a group of U.S. lawmakers, petitioned the CDC, encouraging them to invest heavily in this initiative, asserting that:
No matter how much you try, you’re not going to get everyone to get in line for a weekly nasal swab…however, most Americans utilise a wastewater system, so we can get results from a wider population for a fraction of the cost of individual tests.
The U.K. has also commenced a similar project to develop a standardised UK-wide system for detecting COVID-19 in wastewater, in an attempt to provide an early warning of future outbreaks and reduce costly testing of large populations. Through wastewater epidemiological analysis of human excrement, it is possible to ascertain the wellbeing of the people, the fragments of genetic material (RNA) from the virus can be detected in wastewater;  the UK-wide programme that is working with U.K. universities will be completed by October 2021.
The question is, what regulations are there to prevent the misuse of such biological data? Moreover, what else can they glean from a person’s excreted waste?
Newsha Ghaeli, President and co-founder of Biobots, a leader in wastewater epidemiology, stated that:
At Biobots we are building a global human health database, the first of its kind, by analysing sewerage. This is based on a simple system called wastewater epidemiology. Everyone pees every day and we know that urine contains a rich source of information on our health and wellbeing. Our doctors look at it all the time, and every day we are flushing this data down the toilet where it is aggregating in public sewers. At Biobots, we’re building technology to extract and analyse this data. 
Ghaeli, in explaining how the data is gathered, reveals that it is possible to determine in which street and set of houses the biowaste originated, thus allowing a focused approach to monitoring and treatment. However, if this technology is utilised alongside other technology, it will avail a personalised analysis?
Wastewater epidemiology utilises nanotechnology; however, this is nothing new as water treatment plants have for some time been slowly applying nanotechnology in the filtration and processing of wastewater.   Moreover, the byproduct of geoengineering, in which nano particulates are sprayed/released into the atmosphere, are absorbed into the biosphere.   These nanoparticles now ubiquitous, are ingested by animals and humans and are therefore present in our bodies. However, these nanoparticles are ‘dormant’ not active and therefore deemed to be of no consequence. But could they be reactivated – turned on? The reality is that nanobots can be turned on/off and reprogrammed to carry out a specific job.    Once they have completed the job, say administer medication, then they can remain in the body and later be assigned to clean blocked arteries. Once in the body, nanobots can be reprogrammed and self-replicate or reconfigure whenever programmed by those with the link.
Therefore, could it be possible to reanimate/programme the nanobots that are within our bodies due to geoengineering and have them link with the nanoparticles used within wastewater epidemiology? If this is possible, which I believe it is, then this would avail those researching/analysing the data from the wastewater to have an individual reading. Please note, I am not saying this is being done; what I am saying is that this is a possibility.
However, while this functionality may not be utilised initially, there is a universal move to monitor and obtain our biodata at any cost. The question is, why do governments want this and are you willing to provide your biodata freely? Is this linked to the move to obtain everyone’s DNA information – part of the human genomics project? Furthermore, the vaccine, when implemented, also utilises nanotechnology; therefore, could we see these nanoparticles joining and self-replicating in our bodies to carry out a plethora of possibilities, one being health monitoring of the individual.
The application of nanobots being used within medicine is something academics have researched into, as it avails a plethora of opportunities to enhance life.  In a 2015 study, Amon et al. research proved that it is possible for nanobots carrying medication to be injected into a living organism and controlled externally, by a human operator. The operator is then able to signal for the nanobots to target parts of the brain and release the medication to treat schizophrenia and depression. 
As a proof of principle, we demonstrate activation of DNA robots to cause a cellular effect inside the insect Blaberus discoidalis, by a cognitively straining task. This technology enables the online switching of a bioactive molecule on and off in response to a subject’s cognitive state, with potential implications to therapeutic control in disorders such as schizophrenia, depression, and attention deficits, which are among the most challenging conditions to diagnose and treat.
Bhat, 2014, states regarding nanobots and the future of medicine, that they, nanobots can protect us from the inside and realistically eradicate disease. Rifal et al. assert that nanotechnology can be used instead of vaccination, as vaccinations have side effects, whereas an injection of pre-programmed nanobots that eradicates the infection, disease or toxin are more effective.
Yet, while the benefits of utilising nanotechnology seem good, many are warning of the dangers of using such technology. Celeste Solum, a clinician and former disaster planner with FEMA and Homeland Security, advocates that any Covid-19 vaccination will contain nanobots that will augment with a person’s DNA, making it impossible to remove them. Once a person is injected with nanoparticles, these cannot be removed, only deactivated, until such time as when they can be reactivated. Furthermore, while nanobots can, as academics state, greatly assist humanity in eradicating sickness, they can also be used to control and monitor people. Dr Madej and Dr Kaufman concur with Solum’s assessment and highlight the perils of nanotechnology within the COVID-19 vaccine. Madej expresses grave concerns that the nanobots once placed within the body, can self-replicate and be reassigned to carry out a plethora of tasks. Yet, while nanotechnology offers many benefits, they can also be used to monitor and control people and therefore, raise many concerns.
Whenever the world faces uncertainty, people relinquish, out of fear, individual human rights. Governments pass laws that at the time seem right, but then after the crises have passed, these laws remain in place. Thus, while the world is transfixed upon the perils of the coronavirus, governments are eroding peoples’ human rights. Yet, where is the outcry? The reality is a small majority of people are seeking to wake people up and expose the totalitarian agenda, but the mainstream media do not report these endeavours. If they are reported, then those involved are portrayed as conspiracy nutters.
The sad reality is that people are entrenched in fear and therefore paralysed from seeing what is real and what is a lie – because of fear they accept what the government states or does.
We are witnessing a move to transform global governments and usher in a worldwide totalitarian one-world government through the Great Reset. The Global government will seek to have an omnipresent global reach which will be achieved through nanotechnology. Today, they are monitoring our sewers to collect our biodata without any regulation. Yet, while this could be benign, it has the potential to monitor you covertly. Furthermore, once 5G is active, the ubiquitous nanobots within us and the biosphere will have an unlimited scope. They will be able to monitor and achieve what is evident in science fiction. The question is, what shall we do? What is the solution?
The only solution to the problem is knowing the truth. The Bible informs us that the ‘Truth’ will set us free and that God’s people perish for lack of wisdom/knowledge. Yet, while we need to understand the times we live in and be aware of what is transpiring, this is futile unless a person has a personal relationship with the living God of the Bible.
We are living in dangerous times – a period the Bible outlines as going through Great Tribulation, but with God, we can endure and walk through. The question is, who is the God of your life? Who have you put your faith in?
The world is changing; the Satanic One World Order of the antichrist is being established. Soon you will have to choose which side you are on. You will either embrace/accept the New World Order of the antichrist, one that leads to spiritual death, or you can choose to follow the living God which bestows eternal life. The choice is yours. I urge you to choose life – choose God!
 Mariana Matus, Claire Duvallet, Melissa Kido Soule, Sean M. Kearney, Noriko Endo, Newsha Ghaeli, Ilana Brito, Carlo Ratti, Elizabeth B. Kujawinski, Eric J. Alm, September 2019, ‘24-hour multi-omics analysis of residential sewage reflects human activity and informs public health’. BioRxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/728022
 Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission. National Wastewater Drug Monitoring Program—Report 5, August 2018. (2018) https://www.acic.gov.au/publications/national-wastewater-drug-monitoring-program-reports/national-wastewater-drug-monitoring-program-report-05-2018 . Accessed 15th October 2020.
 Heaton, K. W., Radvan, J., Cripps, H., Mountford, R. A., Braddon, F. E., & Hughes, A. O. (1992). ‘Defecation frequency and timing, and stool form in the general population: a prospective study’. Gut, 33(6), pp. 818-824.
 Keshaviah, A., Gitlin, R., Cattell, L., Reeves, W., de Vallance, J., and Thornton, C. 2016, ‘The Potential of Wastewater Testing for Rapid Assessment of Opioid Abuse (Research Brief)’. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research. https://www.mathematica-mpr.com/our-publications-and-findings/publications/the-potential-of-wastewater-testing-for-rapid-assessment-of-opioid-abuse-research-brief
 van Nuijs, Alexander LN, Foon Yin Lai, Frederic Been, Maria Jesus Andres-Costa, Leon Barron, Jose Antonio Baz-Lomba, Jean-Daniel Berset et al., 2018, ‘Multi-year interlaboratory exercises for the analysis of illicit drugs and metabolites in wastewater: development of a quality control system’. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry.
 CDC, 17th August 2020, ‘Wastewater surveillance: A new public health tool to understanding COVID-19 spread in a community’. Online, accessed 17th October 2020, available from https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/wastewater-surveillance.html
Simon Williams, 2nd July 2020, ‘Work begins on UK system for estimating COVID-19 cases from wastewater’. UK centre for ecology and hydrology, online, accessed 18th October 2020, available from https://www.ceh.ac.uk/press/work-begins-uk-system-estimating-covid-19-cases-wastewater
 Norkio Endo, Newsha Ghaeli, Claire Duvallet, Katelyn Foppe, Timothy B Erickson, Mariana Matus & Peter R Chai. 2020. ‘Rapid assessment of opioid exposure and treatment in cities through robotic collection and chemical analysis of wastewater’. Journal of Medicala Toxicology 16:195–203.
 Zhugen Yang, Marc Anglès d’Auriac, Sean Goggins, Barbara Kasprzyk-Hordern, Kevin V. Thomas, Christopher Frost, Pedro Estrela, June 2015, ‘Sewage Biosensor to Identify Potential Population Biomarker for Monitoring of Public Health’. Bath University, online, accessed 17th October 2020, available from https://researchportal.bath.ac.uk/en/publications/sewage-biosensor-to-identify-potential-population-biomarker-for-m
 Christian Daughton, May 2012, ‘Using biomarkers in sewage to monitor community-wide human health: Isoprostanes as conceptual prototype’. Science of the total environment, 424, pp. 16-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.02.038
 Will Feuer, 25th September 2020, ‘HHS wants to test 30% of U.S. wastewater for the coronavirus as an ‘early warning system’’. CNBC, online, accessed 16th October 2020, available from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/25/hhs-wants-to-test-30percent-of-us-wastewater-for-the-coronavirus.html
 E14 Fund, 10th February 2020, ‘Biobot Analytics: Measuring opioids in city sewage to map consumption in cities’. YouTube, online, accessed 17th October 2020, available from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVUty8UwepI
 Fuqing Wu, Jianbo Zhang, Amy Xiao, Xiaoqiong Gu, Wei Lin Lee, Federica Armas, Kathryn Kauffman, William Hanage, Mariana Matus, Newsha Ghaeli, Noriko Endo, Claire Duvallet, Mathilde Poyet, Katya Moniz, Alex D. Washburne, Timothy B. Erickson, Peter R. Chai, Janelle Thompson, Eric J. Alm. July 2020(a) ‘SARS-CoV-2 Titers in Wastewater Are Higher than Expected from Clinically Confirmed Cases’. American Society for Microbiology, 5(4), pp. 1-9. Available from https://msystems.asm.org/content/msys/5/4/e00614-20.full.pdf
 Fuqing Wu, Amy Xiao, Jianbo Zhang, Katya Moniz, Noriko Endo, Federica Armas, Richard Bonneau, Megan A Brown, Mary Bushman, Peter R Chai, Claire Duvallet, Timothy B Erickson, Katelyn Foppe, Newsha Ghaeli, Xiaoqiong Gu, William P Hanage, Katherine H Huang, Wei Lin Lee, Mariana Matus, Kyle A McElroy, Jonathan Nagler, Steven F Rhode, Mauricio Santillana, Joshua A Tucker, Stefan Wuertz, Shijie Zhao, Janelle Thompson, Eric J Alm. July 2020, ‘SARS-CoV-2 titers in wastewater foreshadow dynamics and clinical presentation
of new COVID-19 cases’. MedRxiv, online, accessed 15th October 2020, available from https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.06.15.20117747v2
 Whitney Webb, 8th October 2020, ‘Secretive HHS AI Platform to Predict US Covid-19 Outbreaks Weeks in Advance’. Unlimited Hangout, online, accessed 15th October 2020, available from https://unlimitedhangout.com/2020/10/uncategorized/secretive-hhs-ai-platform-to-predict-us-covid-19-outbreaks-weeks-in-advance/
 Simon Williams, 2nd July 2020, ‘Work begins on UK system for estimating COVID-19 cases from wastewater’. UK centre for ecology and hydrology, online, accessed 18th October 2020, available from https://www.ceh.ac.uk/press/work-begins-uk-system-estimating-covid-19-cases-wastewater
 Gov.uk. 12th June 2020, ‘Group to measure for coronavirus prevalence in waste water’. Department for Environmental Food & Rural Affairs, online, accessed 17th October 2020, available from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/group-to-measure-for-coronavirus-prevalence-in-waste-water
 E14 Fund
 Prathamesh A. Dhakras, 2011, ‘Nanotechnology Applications in Water Purification
and Waste Water Treatment: A Review’. International conference on nanoscience, engineering and technology, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICONSET.2011.6167965
 Arturo A. Keller, Suzanne McFerran, Anastasiya Lazareva & Sangwon Suh, 2013, ‘Global life cycle releases of engineered nanomaterials’ Journal of Nanoparticles Research, 15(1692), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-013-1692-4
 Faisal Rehman, Khalid Hussain Thebo, Muhammad Aamir & Javeed Akhtar, 2020, Nanomembranes for water treatment, Nanotechnology in the beverage industry, pp.207-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819941-1.00008-0
 J. Marvin Herndon1*, Raymond D. Hoisington2 and Mark Whiteside, March 2020, ‘Chemtrails are not contrails: Radiometric evidence’. Journal of geography, environment and earth science international, 24(2), pp 22-29. Available from http://nuclearplanet.com/hhw.pdf
 J. Marvin Herndon & Mark Whiteside, August 2019, ‘Geophysical Consequences of Tropospheric Particulate Heating: Further Evidence that Anthropogenic Global Warming is Principally Caused by Particulate Pollution’. Journal of geography, environment and earth science international, 22(4), pp. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.9734/jgeesi/2019/v22i430157
 213 AGRIVITA, July 2016, ‘Adverse agricultural consequences of weather modification’. Journal of Agricultural Science. 2016. 38(3), pp.213-221. Available from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305790508_Adverse_agricultural_consequences_of_weather_modification
 Manu Mitra, September 2018, ‘Algorithm for medical nanobots using C++’. Boffin Access: Advances in computer science, 1(3), pp.1-8. DOI: 10.31021/acs.20181112
 Sarah Spickernell, April 2014, ‘DNA nanobots deliver drugs in living cockroaches’. The new scientists, 222(2964).
 Manu Mitra, 2017, ‘Medical nanobots for cell and tissue repair’. Journal of analytical & pharmaceutical research, 2(6).
 Tashnuva Rifat, Mohammed Shahadat Hossain, Mohammed Mahbubul Alam, & Abu Shara Shamsur Rouf, January 2019, ‘A Review on Applications of Nanobots in Combating Complex Diseases’. Bangladesh pharmaceutical journal, 22(1), pp. 99-108.
 Sorna Viswanathan, Revanth Rajan and S. Anitha, 2019, ‘Nanobots in medical field: A Critical overview’. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 8(12), pp. 65-68.
Tashnuva Rifat, Shahadat Hossain, Mahbubul Alam & Abu Rouf, ‘A review of applications of nanobots in combating complex diseases.’ Bangladesh Pharmaceutical Journal, 22(1), pp. 99-108.
 Nathan Barnard, 2020, ‘Could we see the UK implementing mandatory vaccinations?’. The portent times, online, accessed 17th October 2020, available from https://blog.theportenttimes.co.uk/2020/05/11/could-we-see-the-uk-implementing-mandatory-vaccinations/
 Shachar Arnon, Nir Dahan, Amir Koren, Oz Radiano, Matan Ronen, Tal Yannay, Jonathan Giron, LeeBen- Ami, Yaniv Amir, Yacov Hel-Or, Doron Friedman, Ido Bachelet, August 2016, ‘Thought-Controlled Nanoscale Robots in a Living Host’. Plos One, online, accessed 29th April 2020, available from https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0161227&type=printable
 Ibid, p.1.
 Ajinkya Bhat, 20014, ‘Nanobots: The future of medicine’. International Journal of Engineering and Management Sciences, 5(1), pp.44-49.
 Rifat et al. p. 104.
Celeste, 13th April 2020, ‘Celeste Solum – “Mysterious Tendrils From Hell”.’ Youtube, accessed 13th April 2020, available from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FRLBwAcF14&t=1695s
 Dr Carrie Madej, 1st October 2020, ‘Dr. Carrie Madej with Dr. Andrew Kaufman on vx , hydrogel, and secret government programs’. YouTube, online, accessed 16th October 2020, available from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFWECf18Oxs
 John 8:31-32
 Hosea 4:6